
Hooked On a Feeling...
In one whirlwind of an election year, I
saw the following high-profile political personalities in person: President George W Bush, Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton, Michelle Obama, Sarah Palin, Arnold Schwarzenegger, John McCain, and President Barack Obama.
Before I stood a few yards from the then-president Bush, I never really thought about sharing a room with a head of state. I am super-emo when it comes to history, though, and the feeling was stirring.
Of course, highly emotional experiences can have unintended chemical consequences... mysterious reactions... implications for the
sympathetic division of the nervous system... forging inscrutable, often-paradoxical dependencies...
And so I grew more and more addicted to the experience of political groupie-ism. More specifically (I realize after some introspection), I grew addicted to the feeling of isolation that is inevitable at a political event.
An excerpt
from my blog after the Bush speech:
...it was perfectly alienating when the president emphatically declared something to the effect of-- 'It was the right decision when we went into Iraq, it is the right decision now, and it will be the right decision forever!' Violent applause ensued. Despite my generosity, I could not join the standing ovation. I remained seated, trying to act natural. Yikes.
And
from another entry after Michelle came to town:
Despite some bizarre prelude (including a nearly incoherent speech from a hopeful candidate for attorney general, an irresponsible claim that 'Barack is our hope', and a public recitation of the pledge of allegiance, believe it or not!), the event was amazing.
I would submit that Michelle's speech, though 'amazing,' was not quite so invigorating as the feeling of isolation ensuing from the preceding 'incoherent speech', the rapturous profession that 'Barack is our hope', and the saying of the pledge (which never fails to arouse in my mind a certain disdain for America, if only by implication.)
I chose Bush and Michelle to illustrate my point as their speeches, respectively, were the most exasperating and the most inspiring. Yet, in this one respect, my emotional response was the same-- isolation.
There's something inside me that resists joining in the anthem in unison. There's something about retaining individuality in the midst of a mob. I cling to my individuality. I've been called a contrarian, which is a fair accusation. In fact, I think it is this penchant in me to resist the pull of the
imagined community that is so positively American. Even more patriotic than clinging to guns or religion.
At the Sarah Palin rally at the Fort Wayne War Memorial Coliseum, I experienced the apotheosis of my own personal, experiential transition from Bush to Obama. This, I guess, was to be expected.
The Sarah Palin Incident
Permit me the digression. I showed up way early. There were only 100 or 150 people in line in front of me, and it was a stadium event. Picture an unseasonably cold day to wait outside for multiple hours. You can imagine the ideological purity of those willing to brave the cold... And then there's me.
It didn't take long before the extremely unobtrusive blue button was spotted on my manbag-- Obama '08. Immediately, there were two Palinites in my face, threatening violence, demanding to know what I was doing there. I was taken aback by the display, but resolved to play the Gandhi. 'I'm not looking for any trouble.' A circle of people enveloped me. The ringleader, egged on by the crowd, persisted to spout intolerance and violence.
To be honest, I hadn't given a thought to the Obama button. It had been on my bag for a few weeks. It's not like I adopted it especially for the Palin rally. I suppose I was a bit naive not to consider with
whom I was dealing...
In any event, inch by inch, I gained some ground. After several minutes of threatening yells offered just inches from my face (which I endeavered to keep equable), someone from the perimeter shouted above the din, 'let him speak!'
This had been suggested before, but evidently failed to compel the ringleader. The yelling and intimidation had not subsided. This time, however, a few people seconded the suggestion and there opened up some scant space for me to defend myself.
Of course, I refused to defend myself in the way they must have hoped I would. I insisted, 'I'm not looking to stir up anything. I'm like you-- I'm just here to hear Governor Palin speak. She may be the next vice-president of the United States, afterall.'
Seemingly unconvinced of the benignity I professed, the ringleader proceeded to toss inflammatory challenges my way: 'How about that despicable Bill Ayers?' 'Barack Hussein is a socialist! Is socialism what you're after, then?!?' etc.
I admitted to the mob that if Obama were to get elected and if he then appointed Bill Ayers to his cabinet (a hypothetical scenario they insisted I address), that Obama would immediately lose me. This, as he promised not to do that.
I suggested, in an attempt not to seem ironic, that my fellow rally-goers see me as 'potential.' This actually caused a few of them to pause and consider. 'So you are an undecided voter, then?' I was pretty proud of my off-the-cuff response: 'Well, we're all undecided until we press the button, right?'
(Later, in telling this story, I was called out by Steve, who said that this response was disingenuous. Well, I rebutted, what I said was true at least
literally. I mean, for example, if it had come out as an October surprise that Obama and Osama Bin Laden had had surreptitious sexual encounters, then certainly I would not have voted for Obama.)
In any event, I was simply trying my best to pacify a veritable mob. There were moments where I very ingenuously wondered if I was to encounter physical violence. Thankfully, I didn't in the end.
And so inch by inch, I gained ground until I was no longer seen as a serious threat. Sure, there were copious witticisms and verbal jabs lobbed my way, which circumstance was to be expected. And most of them were not overly inappropriate, save for a few audacious remarks. I actually heard someone say, 'What's the "n" in "change" stand for? N*****?' WTF! Although I certainly would have addressed a comment like that in 'real life', I was in no position to do so in this peculiar Other World.
Not long into the standoff, I was accused of being close-minded for wearing the button. The ringleader insisted that I take off the button, if I were in fact open-minded. I continued to pursue harmony at every turn, but I decided inwardly that I was not going to remove the damn button. I suggested that that was what was great about our country-- it was possible to wear a button as a form of peaceful expression without fear of violence or suppression. My audience remained dubious as to this argument.
I did manage, thankfully, to defuse the explosive situation in the end. And, believe it or not, I actually ended up conversing with some pretty thoughtful people. For example, one woman whom I met (and to whom I was introduced as 'the liberal') had been to several Republican conventions and had worked on Quayle's campaign back in the day. She was actually very generous and well-spoken. We were able to dialogue meaningfully about the issues that were important to us. And in her thoughtful responses to my questions, I felt like I could understand more how she was seeing things. It was great.
Another woman who was sitting just behind me in the coliseum, noticed my inauspicious button and expressed surprise and curiosity. She explained, though, that she 'got it.' Her son was in Bible college and was enthusiastic about Obama. She said that it was difficult for her even to imagine voting for a democrat. She was evangelical and culturally conservative. She had been raised that way. Then again, she observed astutely, so had been her son. I told her that my experience was very similar to hers. I come from an evangelical background and my parents are staunchly conservative. I told her that it had been a difficult election season as we have had to learn how to talk about things and engage in meaningful, respectful discourse. My friend did, in fact, 'get' where I was coming from.
Later, Congressman Mark Souder, a well-known douche-bag, in emphasizing the importance of voting (to paraphrase: we can have no influence in what happens in California or Ohio, but we can make a difference here in Indiana), called upon a verse from the Old Testament: '...as for me and my house, WE WILL VOTE MCCAIN / PALIN!' Naturally, I was pretty shocked at the Congressman's blasphemy, but delighted when my newly-found Republican friend leaned forward and said, 'That's not how I remember learning the verse.' I laughed and corroborated her memory, 'Yeah, that's not how I learned it either.'
Without getting into any of the inane things that Governor Palin offered from the stage, I think it's easy to see why I consider this event the apotheosis of my experiment in socio-psycho-political isolation...
Imagining History
Here is a thought that I have found to be compelling this election year, and stimulative to my imagination: My family have been in this country for several generations. Unless I am miscalculating, I am pretty sure that my family were here for the election of Abraham Lincoln. I love to imagine how my family may have seen Lincoln. To be crude, did they (some? all?) vote for him? Did they distrust him? Were they aware of what was going on around them? I have no way of knowing. Still, my imagination runs...
Similarly, I have roots in the German part of Switzerland. (These ancestors first came to this country as part of the Anabaptist movement.) Unless, again, I am mistaken, I am pretty sure I had family just across the border from Germany during the Reformation. I love to imagine how my ancestors might have seen this. Again, were they aware of what was going on? Were they resistant to the new ideologies? Or were they instrumental in the spread of such ideologies? Did these events cause rifts between my ancestors, my family? I love to imagine how things might have played...
Another thought: When my grandpa was my age, how was he experiencing American politics? Was he engaged? How did he see things? How did his experiences shape his views? My grandpa was 24 years old when Dwight Eisenhower was elected. You know, I'd love to read my Grandpa's blog from that year. I'd love to see his thoughts and impressions of history unfolding before his eyes... Of course, my imagination has to fill in these gaping holes.
My grandpa, in 2009, probably has no idea what a blog is. Which makes me wonder... Will my grandchildren have any idea who Sarah Palin was? I hope they have the chance to read right here what their grandfather thought of her. (Luckily, their great-grandparents were not bloggers, thus they don't have to read their dissenting views...)
But back to my grandfather. From what I can piece together, he was in Korea in 1950. I would give anything to be able to read about his thoughts and experiences... But he didn't keep a blog.
Right and Wrong
I know that I have tended to frame the argument in starker terms of right and wrong than I actually believe to be appropriate. Abraham Lincoln. The Protestant Reformation. Sarah Palin. Come on, man. We see what you're up to.
The thing is, who cares if my grandpa was 'right' or 'wrong' in his views of the Korean War or of Dwight Eisenhower (or perhaps more interestingly, Kennedy, who was just eight years later...) It'd be great to read what he was thinking at the time. It'd be great to contrast that with how he sees things retrospectively. And that's really the point of all this for me.
Righting My Wrongs
I have come to terms with the actuality that I cast a vote for George W Bush in 2004, after voting for Ralph Nader in 2000, (the skin behind my ears sufficiently damp.)
I was in Namibia surrounded by Europeans and Africans when I first saw the images from Abu Ghraib.
I still voted for Bush a few months later.
But to be perfectly candid, I began to pay attention in 2004. I kept up a little bit on politics before that, but in 2004, I became more stringent about it.
Having spent significant time abroad since the re-election of George W Bush, I have come to believe that it was not so much his election that decimated the image of America abroad but his re-election, which was seen (rightly, I now believe) as unconscionable.
When Bush resisted McCain on his torture bill, I was absolutely exasperated. At that point, I was finished with W, so to speak.
I first began to see myself as an active supporter of Barack Obama after
Samantha Power came to town on November 13, 2007. She mentioned that night that she was working on the Obama campaign, which left a deep impression upon me. Power's book
A Problem From Hell: America and the Age of Genocide, I want to believe, changed my life. The fact that Barack Obama, with whom I felt something of an affinity since the 2004 convention speech and his acceptance speech in Illinois, was looking to academics and experts (in genocide, no less, an issue that means a lot to me) and not party hacks was striking. The more I learned of Obama, the more I supported his campaign.
I remember my astonishment and excitement when Obama won the Iowa caucus on January 3, 2008. And so a narrative began...
From Bush to Obama
I love that my enumeration of high-profile political personalities seen in-person begins chronologically with President Bush and ends with President Obama. This was my experience, and it was full of wonderment and meaning. Even Indiana
eventually went for Obama; even Indiana
mattered.
In late December 2008, I commenced a road trip with three friends. We ventured west, to California ultimately, with just a rough-draft of an itinerary. It took a little more than three weeks. From L.A., I flew home for a few days before heading east to Washington D.C. for the
inauguration of Barack Obama. The trip, as you would imagine, was epic. It was my first time out west and my first time in California. We saw the Grand Canyon. We spent meaningful time with numerous friends scattered between here and both coasts. From sea to shining sea. The trip ended at the inauguration of the new president. A great American moment.
What is obvious is this: January 2009 will almost surely be the moment in my life in which I loved America the most. There is some evidence, in my estimation, that Barack Obama will make a good president. I hope he does, for the sake of this country and for the sake of the world. Of course, many candidates with ample potential mature into mediocre presidents. Time, as they say, will tell.
Regardless, January 2009 will forever be an American moment for me. I'm glad, and grateful, to have lived it.